Latin America 2011 - Saturday 3rd December 2011

This year’s Latin America Conference will be held at Congress House in London on Saturday 3rd December 2011.

The annual Latin America Conferences provide a fascinating insight into the reality of the region and effective ways for people in the UK to find out more and support these struggles and movements by getting involved in
solidarity work.

Confirmed speakers include:

  • Families of the Miami Five from Cuba
  • Alberto Juantorena – Olympic Gold medal winner and former Cuban Vice-Minister for Sport
  • Egle Sanchez – Venezuelan trade union leader
  • Samuel Moncada – Venezuelan Ambassador to UK
  • Guissell Morales-Echaverry - Nicaraguan Embassy
  • Frances O'Grady - TUC Deputy General Secretary
  • Sally Hunt - UCU General Secretary
  • Billy Hayes - CWU General Secretary
  • Bob Crow - RMT General Secretary
  • Richard Gott - Academic
  • Victoria Brittain - Writer
  • Jeremy Corbyn MP
  • Colin Burgon – Former Labour MP and Vice-Chair of the Venezuela Solidarity Campaign.
  • Plus speakers and eyewitness reports from Colombia, Honduras, Bolivia, Guatemala, Mexico and across the continent.

Tickets cost £10 waged and £6 unwaged and are available from the Cuba Solidarity Campaign via telephone (020 8800 0155) or online closer to the time.

Please join the Facebook Event to stay up-to-date with speakers. Full details can also be found here.

Suggested Twitter hashtag: #LatinAmerica2011

Latin America 2011 Noam Chomsky Lecture - Saturday 8th October 2011

We are very sorry but tickets for this event are sold out. Reports and videos will be available online soon after the event.

Suggested Twitter hashtag: #Chomsky2011

United in solidarity

Len McCluskey is General Secretary of Unite the Union 

Len McCluskey
The continent of Latin America is changing rapidly and the good news is that it is the people of Latin America themselves that are driving this progressive agenda. For the first time the people of the continent are taking control of their own resources and their own destinies, and this model of continental self-determination is one we should all applaud and support.

For too many years the vast majority of the Latin America population has been subjugated by a wealthy elite empowered by the multinational corporations predominantly based in the United States. Illiteracy, ill health and overriding poverty was the norm for most people, with any wealth generated quickly being exported northwards to bolster the profit margins of US based corporations.

This social progress and resistance to the global advance of neo-liberalism has been lead by the countries of ALBA, (Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas) and includes Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia and Nicaragua.

Some of the advances won by the people of these countries are truly remarkable on any scale:
  • Better life expectancy and infant mortality in Cuba than parts of the US
  • The expansion of adult literacy in Venezuela, Bolivia and Nicaragua at a rate seen nowhere else in the world
  • International health programmes such as Mission Milagro (Mission Miracle), where nearly 2 million people have had their eyesight improved or restored more
  • More than 2,000 doctors graduated through the Latin American School of Medicine and 6,000 students part of this new medical training program that emphasises internationalism and humanism.
  • The creation of the ALBA Bank with a capital of $1 billion and a stated aim ‘to boost industrial and agricultural production among its members, support social projects as well as multilateral cooperation agreements among its members’
So why are the advances of the people in countries such as Cuba and Venezuela not more widely publicised throughout the world? The answer is of course the fear of the good example.

If socialism can be seen to be delivering for the peoples of Cuba and Venezuela, where does this leave the trickle down theories of neo-liberalism that encourages extremes of wealth and argues that if the rich get even richer, some of the excess will trickle down to us?

This is the reason that even the soft centre Obama government has not yet been able to reverse the policies of containment and aggression towards progressive Latin America.

First and foremost among this aggressive policy is the nearly 50 year old illegal blockade of Cuba which has been condemned by almost every country of the world at the United Nations. How disgraceful – so much for the rule of law!

Initially just a trade embargo, the system has been extended to include third countries so that if a British company does business with Cuba it may find its US subsidiary interests sequestered by the US, even when it’s perfectly legal for an EU firm to do business with Cuba.

Secondly, there is the outrageous case of the Miami 5. Working purely at uncovering terrorist activities against Cuba emanating from Miami – these five brave Cubans went to the US and reported back to the Cuban Government who passed on the details to the FBI. Instead of arresting the terrorists the FBI arrested the five men. Then in a completely unjust trial which has been condemned by Amnesty International, they were imprisoned for long sentences including one receiving double life. So much for the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Now, to add to the terrible injustice and against the normal rights given to the families of prisoners, the US government has refused two of the men’s wives the chance to visit their husbands for over 10 years.

My union Unite can feel proud of its work in the campaign to Free the Five. We have been pre-eminent in organising major fringe meetings at the TUC Congress and Labour Party Conference to open up the case of the Five to a wider audience. At the same time we have arranged for the families of the Five to meet the most senior Government ministers to make the case for UK support for their claim to the humanitarian right to visit their loved ones in jail.

And what of Venezuela?  At the moment it seems doubly blessed - it has socialism and it also has oil. For 12 years, Hugo Chávez has led revolutionary change in Venezuela and has proved inspirational to others in Latin America.

Millions of working people are now enrolled in literacy programmes, Cuban medical teams are taking health care into the barrios for the first time, and basic food stuffs are widely available at subsidised prices. Without doubt socialism in Venezuela is making a material difference to working people in all aspects of their lives.

The success of Chávez has been an inspiration to other socialist leaders in Latin America, most notably Evo Morales in Bolivia and Rafael Correa in Ecuador, who are forging ahead with their own socialist visions.

Using Venezuela’s oil wealth, Chávez has been at the forefront of the creation of the new economic bloc in the region, ALBA, not based on neo-liberalism as is the US led Free Trade Area of the Americas, but offering support for Latin America, for the Latin American people, based on the principles of social justice. Little wonder that in 2002, the US was implicated in the short lived coup against Chávez.

Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador and all the ALBA countries, are dangerous for the US because they show an alternative. They show how society can be structured differently, shifting wealth and power away from the rich and powerful and towards working people and their families.

Here in Britain I am proud of the support that Unite and the British trade Union movement has been able to give to support social progress in the region. We work in partnership with Latin American solidarity campaigns for Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua and Colombia.

Their work has been exemplary. This magazine Adelante, and the hugely successful annual Latin American conferences, are a real testament to the collective workings of these campaigns and I am proud to be part of that long history of international solidarity.

The power of international solidarity is immense. When workers join hands across nations and oceans, justice will prevail. I hope you will join us. Venceremos!

ALBA – The Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas

ALBA Emblem
The Bolivarian Alternative for Latin America, known as ALBA from its abbreviation in Spanish, was launched in Havana in 2005 by Cuba and Venezuela.

In 2006, this alternative trade alliance was joined by Bolivia, and today it boasts a full eight  members: Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Dominica, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Antigua and Barbuda; plus four countries with observer status: Grenada, Haiti, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

Although the alliance seeks to reduce or eliminate tariffs between member countries it is very unlike conventional trade agreements.

ALBA is a deliberate counterweight by countries of Latin America and the Caribbean to the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA /ALCA in Spanish) proposed by the United States. ALCA advocates the liberalisation and privatisation of public services, which would inevitably mean millions of people in the continent would be deprived of the basic services needed for human survival. However, in contrast to ALCA which focuses on an unregulated market, free trade and economic liberalisation to generate growth and prosperity in the region, ALBA advocates social, political, and economic integration and social reforms which place the fight against poverty and exclusion at its centre.

In order to help overcome trade disadvantages, ALBA pushes for solidarity with the economically weakest countries, with the aim of achieving a free trade area in which all of its members benefit (a win-win alliance).

The first agreement between Cuba and Venezuela focused on the exchange of medical and educational resources and petroleum between both.

The second round of agreements between Cuba, Bolivia and Venezuela in 2006 saw Cuba promise to help Bolivia provide free eye treatment to those Bolivians who otherwise would not be able to afford it, while Venezuela agreed to provide Bolivia with oil at preferential rates.

A joint declaration between Evo Morales, Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro following this meeting stated: “...we fully agree that the ALBA will not become a reality with mercantilist ideas or the selfish interests of business profitability or national benefit to the detriment of other peoples.”

Other examples of cooperation through ALBA have included free medical scholarships for students at Cuba’s Latin America School of Medicine, and Cuban medical brigades providing primary health care in many countries. Cuba and Venezuela have a joint agreement to work on the design of a continental project to eliminate illiteracy in Latin America. Venezuela has also provided petroleum and mining industry expertise and oil at preferential rates to many countries.

From January 2010, member nations also agreed use a new currency dubbed the "sucre" for trade among themselves. Although no sucres will be printed or coined, the virtual currency will be used as a common currency for electronic transactions to manage debts between governments while reducing reliance on the US dollar and on Washington in general.

Cuba - the threat of a good example

Operation Miracle
April 2011, marked the 50th anniversary of Cuba’s victory over CIA backed forces at the Bay of Pigs, or Playa Girón as it is known throughout the island.

This violent and unprovoked attack is the most overt and widely known of all the US government’s attempts to destroy the Cuban Revolution. Less commonly known are the subsequent 50 years of US blockade, covert interference, aggression and propaganda.

Since Robert Kennedy declared that removing the Cuban government ranked as “top priority of the United States” in 1961, twelve successive US administrations have funded or turned a blind eye to aggression launched from their shores including chemical warfare, bombing campaigns, assassination plots, and attempting to fund and stir up internal dissent. Attacks which have seen 3,478 Cubans slaughtered since 1959.
 
Most brutal of all of these acts remains the blockade which has been tightened and intensified every decade since its introduction in 1962 to strangle the economy and wear down the Cuban people.

The blockade and associated legislation has been expanded to include not just US companies but other country’s ability to trade with Cuba. US-initiated restrictions on banks, business and shipping mean that it is impossible for many companies to trade, whilst those that do can face penalties from the US.

In 2009, Amnesty International Secretary General, Irene Khan, wrote: "The US embargo against Cuba is immoral and should be lifted…it's preventing millions of Cubans from benefiting from vital medicines and medical equipment essential for their health."

Why are US governments obsessed with causing such suffering in Cuba? What danger can Cuba possibly pose to them to justify such inhumanity?

Nothing but the threat of a good example. Since 1960, when Cuba first dispatched thousands of volunteer teachers to help eradicate illiteracy in remote parts of the island, the US has feared that other Latin America citizens might look across the water and aspire to the social gains that the Cuban revolution had delivered to its people.

According to a CIA in the 1960s:“If Cuba succeeds we can expect most of Latin America to fall.” Brutal US backed repression throughout Latin America during the 70s and 80s and the imposition of neo-liberal economic policies in the 90s gave the US confidence that their nightmare scenario of a continent following Cuba’s example could not come true. But today, the failure of these policies sees a new Latin America breaking free from US economic and political control. Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua are following the beacon that Cuba first lit by championing policies of health, education, social justice and internationalism, and many other countries in the region are benefiting from the new alliances.

Just as with its own literacy brigades in 1961, Cuba’s ‘Yo, Si Puedo’ literacy method has helped to teach more than 4 million people in 30 countries to read and write in since 2004. Three countries have gone on to declare themselves illiteracy free.
Cuban doctor in Haiti

In Haiti, Cuban health workers have saved more than 250,000 lives since they started working in the country in 1998, and were the first on the ground setting up field hospitals and treating patients in the aftermath of the earthquake in 2010. This year, Cuba signed a tripartite agreement with Brazil, whose resources will fund Cuban doctors and materials to rebuild and train Haiti’s health service and workers benefiting 75% of the Haitian population.

Cuba has never sought to gain or exploit in its international commitments. Speaking in a solidarity conference in 1995, Nelson Mandela said: “Cubans came to our region as doctors, teachers, soldiers, agricultural experts, but never as colonizers. They have shared the same trenches with us in the struggle against colonialism, underdevelopment, and apartheid. Hundreds of Cubans have given their lives, literally, in a struggle that was, first and foremost, not theirs but ours. As Southern Africans we salute them. We vow never to forget this unparalleled example of selfless internationalism.”

And what of the US government response to such selfless internationalist efforts to provide health, education and social care for worlds poor? Wikileaks cables released this year show their policy is to trawl for stories which might dispel Cuba’s “myth of medical prowess”, and try to lure away Cuban doctors volunteering on international missions by offering preferential treatment and entry visas to the US.

Like most other countries, Cuba is not immune to the world economic crisis. Unlike others, it suffers twofold as the crisis falls on top of an economy already struggling under 50 years of blockade and still recovering from the effects two hurricanes in 2008 which decimated the economy. Despite this, Cuba continues to prioritise health and education, and maintain internationalist commitments. While students march against cuts on streets of UK, Cuba still provides its young people with free lifelong education including at higher and university levels.

It is a testament to the determination of the Cuban people that they have defended their independence and the achievements won by their revolution despite relentless attacks from world’s greatest superpower for more than 50 years. And it is testament to the international solidarity movement that the country can count on so many friends around the world to speak out against the illegal blockade and for Cuba’s right to self determination free from foreign interference.

You can show your support Cuba by joining the Cuba Solidarity Campaign today.

Natasha Hickman, Communications Manager at the Cuba Solidarity Campaign. Please email for more information.

Venezuela: countering right-wing propaganda

Telling the truth about Venezuela will be more important than ever over the coming months as we enter the countdown to Venezuela’s Presidential elections in December next year.

Against the backdrop of the world recession effecting Venezuela in recent years, increased representation for the right-wing opposition in the Venezuelan parliament, and a strengthened US republican right - seeking to “confront Hugo Chavez directly” in the words of US Congressman Connie Mack – we are already seeing a stepped up campaign of disinformation seeking to undermine support internationally for progress in Venezuela, including in the British media. The distortions we have seen already almost certainly reflect the tip of the iceberg regarding distorted media coverage about developments in Venezuela in the months ahead.

An example of media distortion: response to the floods

Venezuela has been one of the victims of the spate of floods at the end of 2010 and beginning of 2011. Over 35 died and others are still missing following the heaviest rains in 40 years at the end of 2010. Over 100,000 were left homeless, with infrastructure badly damaged and agriculture hugely affected. The human costs of this tragedy continue.

The response of Venezuela’s government has been swift, deep and ongoing, with the Presidential palace even opened to flood victims with many now living there until houses are built. Other key aspects have included the setting up of over 900 refuges to house the 133,000 people left homeless and ensuring that 1000s of empty hotel rooms have also been used to temporarily house those made homeless, Additionally, and crucially, an impressive new national housing programme is to be accelerated, with $1 billion to be invested in new housing this year.

In the British media, there has been relatively little coverage of this disaster, which is understandable given the much greater human causalities elsewhere. However what is less explicable is why the little coverage there was, has been politicised in such a way to focus not on the human tragedy but into another distorted tale of President Chavez undermining democracy, with little or no mention of the government’s pro-active response to the crisis.

Specifically, a number of stories repeated claims from Venezuela’s right-wing opposition that enabling powers granted to Chavez in response to the disasters were a step towards dictatorship. In reality, these enabling powers have been granted specifically because of the enormous humanitarian disaster of the floods, which requires the fast-tracking of legislation.

Furthermore, the temporary granting of enabling powers is a constitutional power commonly enacted by former presidents. Far from allowing President Chavez to govern the country by decree, the powers exist to allow passing laws in specified areas. The Supreme Court must approve any decrees that have a constitutional implication, and the National Assembly may also modify or rescind any law passed in this way!
  
Yet, despite these facts and the context of natural disasters and human tragedy, still a narrative was build up with stories in papers such as the Independent and Guardian declaring that “'Dictator' Chavez to Rule by Decree” or quoting the opposition about a "coup against the constitution."

When Chavez then made clear shortly afterwards that the powers were likely to be applied for only six months, there was a near total silence in the Western media.

When it comes to Venezuela, the truth appears less important than the story!

The positive truth about Venezuela today

Sadly this example of one-sided media coverage of Venezuela is not an exception, but rather the norm. How many British people would know that in Venezuela today a new national health service is being built for the first time in the country’s history? Or that prior to 1998, there were only 14 national elections in 50 years, and under Chavez since then there have already been more than that, verified free and fair by electoral observers?

There is an exciting story that could be told about Venezuela of how a new society is being built, where people’s living standards and public services are being protected despite the deep global recession. Omission and distortion of this tale is frequent. Major ’good news stories’ in 2010 and the early months of 2011 that you may not have heard include:
  • Venezuelans show the highest support for democracy in the region in 2010 according to the respected Latinobarometro report.
  • Inequality decreased at a rate five times higher than many other countries in Latin America between 1998 to 2008, and a report issued by the Organization of American States (OAS) and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) in October 2010 found that poverty in Venezuela dropped by 44%, the single biggest decrease in the region.
  • Currently, over 2 million Venezuelans are in higher education, compared to 600,000 in 1998, making Venezuela the country with the second largest percentage of students in HE in the region, with 83% enrolment rate in higher education institutions - the fifth highest worldwide. 
  • Despite regular media reports to the contrary, the Venezuelan government has moved aggressively to make access to the Internet free and universal. In recent years, 668 local Infocenters – community-based Internet access points – have been founded, and were awarded a UNESCO prize in 2010.
  • During the UN Millennium Development Goals Summit Venezuela announced that it had achieved a number of development targets ahead of schedule and would meet the remaining ones by the 2015 deadline.
Your solidarity needed!

Indeed, as many countries throughout the world face savage cuts and dislocation, the reality is that a far more positive story can be told about Venezuela - that despite tumbling oil revenues and global economic downturn, the social programmes budget has been defended and, in some areas, even expanded. In 2010, almost 46% of the government's budget was allotted to social spending such as health and education, and this is increasing further in 2011.

Supporters of Venezuela therefore need to redouble efforts to both communicate the great things that are being done in Venezuela to protect and expand public services such as health and education and counter the misinformation campaign coming from the Venezuelan oligarchy.

The social advances in Venezuela are under threat from powerful, international, political and economic interests that benefit from the neo-liberal status quo. It is this status quo that the Chavez administration challenges – and why this media offensive exists and will continue.

Venezuela shows that another world is possible. It needs our solidarity. Please join the Venezuela Solidarity Campaign today.

Matt Willgress, Coordinator of the Venezuela Solidarity Campaign. Please email for more information. 

Nicaragua and ALBA

Since the Sandinista government returned to power in 2007 trade and other forms of ALBA solidarity have played a significant role in keeping Nicaragua afloat economically, and resulted in export growth and the beginning of diversification of the economy away from a high dependence on the IMF, US and Europe. Trade between the two countries has increased nearly 6,000% from $2 million in 2006 to $248m in 2010.  Funding for ALBA social programmes has come through PetroCaribe. According to Paul Oquist Kelley, Nicaraguan government representative at the September 2010 UN Summit to review progress on the Millennium Development Goals:
Nicaragua has benefited from the most ingenious innovation in development financing of the 21st Century. This consists in Venezuelan solidarity channelled via the PetroCaribe agreements which converts half of the petrol costs of poor countries into low interest, long term credit for poverty reduction.
ALBA social programmes in Nicaragua

Housing: Nicaragua needs 400,000 new houses and half a million existing houses are not fit to live in. To address this problem the ‘Roof Plan’ programme will provide 250,000 families with ten sheets of corrugated iron and nails to improve the roofs of their houses. In addition ‘Houses for the people’ offers low interest loans to 5,000 public sector workers. This programme has also generated over 5,000 construction jobs.   

Zero Hunger:  Channelled through women farmers with the aim of  improving the nutrition of rural families through the production of diary products, meat, and cereals. The longer term goal is to increase production to supplement household income through selling surplus locally. A package worth $2,000 is given to participating families including a cow, a pig, poultry, a biodigester, seeds and materials for building pens. This is backed up with training and technical support. This programme will benefit 75,000 families over five years.

Zero Usury: Micro credit scheme that has provided 80,000 women with low interest credit of up to US$200 to establish or improve small businesses.  The women also receive support in drafting business plans and training in business development.

A voice for everyone:  In 2009/10 the first ever Nicaragua disability census was carried out by a Cuban-Nicaraguan medical brigade. The brigade recorded 126,308 people with disabilities, about 2.2 percent of the population. The results of this survey will form the basis of government programmes to support those with disabilities.

Operation Miracle: Over a million people with sight problems have been treated by Cuba medical teams and local medical staff as part of Operation Miracle in Latin America, Asia and Africa including 65,000 Nicaraguans living in poverty. 

Energy supply: Within 12 months of coming to power, the FSLN government had eliminated 12 hours per day power cuts largely thanks to Venezuelan support in the form of generating plants.

Bonuses for low paid workers: In May 2009, President Ortega announced a US$25 per month bonus, to be paid from ALBA funds, for 120,000 public sector workers earning less than $300 per month. This amount is very significant for low paid workers, particularly women.

South – South fair trade and food security:  Rural development programmes to support small and medium farmers are central to government programmes to guarantee local food supplies and to develop a new form of fair trade with Venezuela based on ALBA principles. Small scale farmers and the cooperatives receive advance payment for guaranteed quantities of produce. A longer term commitment is being developed to build processing plants so that value can be added in Nicaragua.  Small farmers will receive $10m financing for programmes in 2011 from ALBA and other sources. 

ALBA infrastructure projects include power plants generating electricity, a road construction programme and a huge oil refinery named “The supreme dream of Bolivar’ which will give Nicaragua the capacity to supply refined oil to Central America and the Caribbean.

Helen Yuill, Campaigns Organiser at the Nicaragua Solidarity Campaign. Please email for more information.   

Nicaragua turns the page on illiteracy

Maria and Noami completed a Yo Si Puedo
course in Managua
Yo si puedo (Yes, I can)

In 2007 an estimated 26% of the adult population were illiterate in Nicaragua. In July that year, the government launched a national campaign with the aim of eradicating illiteracy in two years. Thousands of university students worked with community leaders to carry out surveys and act as literacy facilitators, with support from Cuban advisors and equipment supplied by Venezuela. The Yo Si Puedo method was developed in Cuba and has been used successfully in more than 30 countries. In June 2009, an independent UNESCO commission declared that Nicaragua’s level of illiteracy had fallen to 4.73 percent, qualifying it as a country free of illiteracy - the fourth Latin American nation to achieve this distinction. The others are Cuba, Venezuela and Bolivia. This replicated the Sandinista literacy crusade of 1980 when 400,000 learned to read and write in five months. UNESCO Permanent Secretary Juan Bautista Arríen commented:
The Literacy Crusade impacted on everything that’s alive in a society. Nicaragua became a kind of beacon, a symbol of what a country can do, above all through its young people.  It was extraordinary.   
The Yo Si Puedo method is based on self teaching using videos, and takes into account students’ social circumstances. Facilitator provided support and encouragement, while the Ministry of Education, local councils and NGOs were responsible for supervision, training and logistical support. Eighty Cuban educationalists provided overall support, and Venezuela technical equipment.

Yo Si Puedo in practice

Maria had learned to read and write in the first literacy crusade, but had lost her skills due to lack of practice. This time, she is determined to use them at home, and enrol on the follow up course. “I didn’t want to be in darkness – not able to read and write is like being blind,” she said.

Noami didn’t finish her schooling because she became pregnant at 15. The course has given her another opportunity to continue her education and to further her interest in maths and literacy. Both women explained the difference that literacy has made to their lives: the ability to understand and claim their rights; to help their children and grandchildren with their school work; and to support and encourage others to go to classes. Noami explained that it had been difficult for her to be seen to join the class, but she is pleased she has and hopes to become a teacher herself.

Colombia: New President – Old Repression

Aguilas Negras - Paramilitaries
On 7 August 2010 Juan Manuel Santos was inaugurated as President of Colombia, replacing the notorious Alvaro Uribe Velez. In his maiden speech President Santos spoke of the need for prosperity, justice and peace, that he was willing to seek a “true reconciliation among Colombians” and notably, of an unlocked “door to dialogue.” Almost immediately Santos began pushing through a Law on Land and Victims, ostensibly to restore land to victims of displacement and compensate victims of human rights abuses. Whilst these initiatives and the change in rhetoric compared to Uribe are welcome, Colombian trade unions and human rights groups maintain a healthy scepticism in the light of continued abuses by both paramilitaries and state forces. It remains to be seen both whether President Santos’ rhetoric is sincere, and if it is, whether he will be able to overcome the hardline vested interests among political supporters and in the state’s apparatus.

Since his inauguration more than 70 trade unionists, social activists, human rights defenders and members of the political opposition have been killed, among them several leaders of the displaced population who campaigned for the return of their lands. This lack of security for returning victims of displacement is just one of the reasons why the victims movement in Colombia does not support President Santos’ much-vaunted Land and Victims Law. Victims organisations note that the law has arbitrary cut-off dates that exclude abuses committed during the early 1980s when paramilitaries and the army carried out several notorious massacres, and only includes displacements that occurred after 1991. The reality is that forced displacement goes back much further. Furthermore, they point out that the proposed law does not admit state responsibility for abuses or displacement, in effect giving immunity to members of the armed forces and police. According to the victims, the scale of abuses is such that only an unlimited truth and justice commission can hope to achieve a true reconciliation among all Colombians.

Living well: a new model for development from Bolivia’s indigenous revolution

Under the presidency of Evo Morales, Bolivia has taken a leading role in global climate change negotiations. It did so most recently at the UN Climate Change Conference in Cancún, but also hosted the World People’s Conference on Climate Change (WPCCC) in Cochabamba in April 2010 and spoke out against the Copenhagen Accord at the 2009 UN Climate Change Conference. Among the ideas underpinning Bolivia’s principled position - pushing for the most ambitious agreement to tackle climate change and defend “mother earth” (or Pachamama) - is that of vivir bien or “living well”.

Vivir bien is an evolving concept emanating from Latin America’s indigenous peoples. The term translates as sumak kawsay and suma qamaña in Quechua and Aymara, the two main indigenous languages of the Andes. It brings some common notions from a variety of indigenous peoples, both from the Andean highlands and the Amazon jungle.

In Bolivia there are communities that still live and organise themselves in pre-capitalist, pre-colonial ways. These are based on communal land systems and crop rotation, on barter and exchange instead of money transactions, and ways of making decisions on the basis of consensus. Their leaders are elected on a rotational basis.

Such modes of life - which have evolved and have been sustained over thousands of years - require a careful balance between members of the community, men and women and within families. To live off the land, it is also necessary to maintain a fine balance between the community and the environment they live in. This means using sufficient natural resources (water, land etc.) to meet people’s needs, while not overproducing in a way that would damage the local eco-system and jeopardise production in the future.

Latin America 2010 Conference Report

The sixth annual Latin America ‘Adelante’ conference packed out Congress Hall on Saturday 4 December, despite a snow struck morning in London. Possibly in respect of this year being the 200th centenary year of many Latin American countries independence and that in 1810 Simon Bolivar travelled to London to enlist support from the British for the revolution that had finally begun in South America or because as Walter Sandino said “the continent is now changing as my grandfather dreamed”, more than 400 people heard speakers and workshops go into detail about the “other world that is possible” and happening today in Latin America.

Welcomed by SERTUC Regional Secretary Megan Dobney, George Galloway set the scene by remembering the ‘other’ 9/11 when the US sponsored coup d’etat “drowned in blood the socialist experiment of Allende in Chile”, yet the continent has now seen the great internationalist sacrifices and social achievements of the Cubans inspire people across the whole continent. Joking about being on Fox news and constantly hearing Chavez referred to as a dictator he pointed out to applause that he is the most democratically elected politician on earth.

Jean Lambert Green MEP, talked about the positive and inspirational role the peoples movements from Latin America are having, as we try to rebalance the world and restore harmony with nature and human beings, for all our futures sake.

Christine Blower General Secretary of the National Union of Teachers said “Yes to social progress and no to US intervention”. She praised the commitment to education she had witnessed on a recent trip to Cuba and especially the fact that it did not promote consumerism and contempt for others. By investing in education and seeing it as an inviolable human right she described some of the success and achievements in Cuba and Venezuela. Contrasting them with Colombia she reminded us all of the dangers of being a Trade unionist and teacher in that country.

Seumus Milne, Guardian journalist, contrasted the situation twenty years ago – with the end of the Soviet Union, heralded triumph of capitalism and the death of socialism, a unipolar world – with today. The US is embroiled in a failed war on terror, the rise of China goes on, the 2008 financial crisis is not over and the progressive tide sweeping Latin America is offering a real alternative. It is no surprise that Latin America, which was the first to experience the neo-liberal economic shock doctrine, is the continent now challenging that economic orthodoxy, challenging racism and promoting indigenous peoples rights. It is not a settled outcome though and it will be resisted by a US committed to “roll back”. As Wiki Leaks has proved, the coup in Honduras was clearly a coup although it was denied by the US. Therefore the need for solidarity and support for the demand that the media report fairly on Latin America has never been more important said Seumus.

Workshops took place on climate change and global negotiations, the US militarisation of Latin America, Cuba’s economic development and labour relations, the struggle to develop national identity and culture, Media representation of Latin America, ALBA and economic development, Haiti, the earthquake and beyond and Venezuela – empowering the people and social inclusion. The impressive array of speakers, the level of detail and debate in each workshop meant that all delegates wanted to be in more than one room at a time!

At the next plenary, Latin Americans took centre stage with Samuel Moncada, the Venezuela Ambassador telling us how the current environmental emergency in his country brought about by extreme rain was only averted from real disaster by state “organisation, preparation and the will to act”. He contrasted this climate catastrophe affecting his country with Wikileaks revelations on how powerful countries are spending all their time trying to stop countries from helping themselves or their people.“The social policy of the US is to destroy our social policy” – for example “to encourage Cuban doctors to defect to Miami instead of letting them help poor people who need them” he explained. Through their slanders, smears and spinning information they “obviously see us as dangerous but Venezuela’s social policy, to help the poor who are being cheated by the banks and the rich is an integral part of our world view.” Proclaiming that Venezuela will not “shut up” he predicted further problems for Obama who no longer controls a Foreign Affairs committee now dominated by the right wing in Congress.

At her first appearance in front of a large European audience new Cuban Ambassador Esther Armenteros told us the blockade is stronger than ever against Cuba despite all the hopes people had for the Obama administration. Recalling her personal horrors at the effects of a blockade that denies small children eye cancer treatment she asked why “does someone up there say we are the enemy: what kind of enemy can a child be with cancer?”

She reiterated that Cuban socialism is an equality of opportunity and human rights for all and that each will receive according to what they offer to society. The pressures Cuba now faces will mean the success of this battle will sustain the socialist model into the future.

Reminding us of the solidarity shown by Barbados, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago on the 8th December 1972 by re-establishing full relations with Cuba she expressed gratitude for them for ending the isolation and promised Cuba would always stand up for social justice and solidarity not only in the Caribbean, Latin America but also the world.

Guisell Morales-Echaverry, the Nicaraguan Ambassador, praised the voice of unity and respect that was Sandino and proclaimed ALBA as his legacy, embodying solidarity and mutual respect. It has given us an opportunity to develop economic independence and improve social conditions, not only in Nicaragua but throughout all the countries involved.

Fidel Narvarez described how the agenda for Ecuador was the long standing one “of all indigenous peoples”. The “recovery of sovereignty, by shaping our own destiny” along with the control of natural resources aligned with the “pursuit of social justice, redistribution of wealth to benefit the most vulnerable and a decrease in the gap between the rich and the poor” are all interlinked he said. Describing his countries efforts and achievements he highlighted how social investment is now higher than debt repayments and has increased every year for the last four years. “What we are witnessing is more than a few South American countries challenging imperialism” he said “We are at the forefront of the implementation of post neo-liberal economies”. “This is not a time of changes but a change of time” he said as he predicted even greater things to come for a continent striving to achieve one great Bolivarian nation.

Former London Mayor, Ken Livingstone, praised London’s Latin America community for its diversity and culture which he said enriches all of us, but lamented why so many were forced to flee their countries either as result of coups or poverty. Commenting on Wikileaks he deplored the accounts of our politicians sucking up, obsequiously to their American counterparts who are responsible for so many of the problems in the world. Praising the role of Cuba and others as an inspiration he warned of the dangers of the US backlash. He stressed the significance of China as a country that invests 46% each year in internal infrastructure projects and he urged Latin America to do likewise.

Referencing ‘The Spirit level’ and the need to share wealth and reduce inequality he stressed that only Cuba stands out in the book as having the best indices for the life of its citizens. Imagining what Cuba would have done without the effects of the blockade waged against it since 1962, he re-iterated his pledge to hopefully celebrate Cuban achievements as part of his term of office when he is, hopefully re-elected as Mayor in 2012.

More workshops on the Cuban Blockade, Mexico and the USA, Colombia and its political prisoners, Ecuador and Honduras and the coup attempts, Venezuela, Nicaragua and the life of Augusto Cesar Sandino, Bolivia and the Morales Government and a film screening of Quien dijo Miedo (We are not afraid) inside the coup in Honduras completed the afternoon sessions.

The final Plenary heard from Hugh Lanning, Deputy General Secretary of the PCS who posed the question as to how Ireland, Greece, the UK and others would fare in the current economic climate if we were in ALBA. Reminding us in the words of Jose Marti that they will “inflame us, subvert us and suffocate us” Hugh urged us all to remain vigilant and our solidarity strong because “we want them to win so we can too”.

Steve Hart, London Regional Secretary from Unite also reminded us of the threats from the US. As the UK Secretary of the Chile Solidarity Campaign during the 1970s, after the coup, he described the horrors of what happened because we need to “remind ourselves of the raw face of capitalism”. The recent coup attempts in Latin America could easily happen again or terrorist attacks could be stepped up and sanctioned again by the US. Referring to his union’s work on behalf of the Miami Five and Unite General Secretary Tony Woodley’s recent visit to Gerardo Hernandez, he urged everyone to never forget these brave Cuban heroes imprisoned in US jails for fighting against terrorism.

Jeremy Corbyn MP referred to the situation in Haiti and the cycle of debt and poverty it has been forced into for nearly 200 years for having the audacity of overthrowing slavery and becoming independent. That mentality, as typified by the Monroe Doctrine, remains to this day part of the US mindset.

In posing the question as to why someone like Evo Morales was elected he said it was “not because he was an indigenous Indian or didn’t speak Spanish”, but because he fought against “structural adjustment programmes, water privatisation and for reducing the gap between the rich and the poor”. Praising ALBA, he said Cuba’s involvement was key to countries trying to close the economic gap by prioritising health and education. A political economy based on the social needs of people and the elimination of poverty is what ALBA is about and why it is so important. He also reminded us that what is going on will inevitably attract the attention of the US for the simple reason that the continents natural resources are so vast.

Calling on us to put aside the idea that only left progress can come out of European thinking he urged us all to learn from the fantastic and inspirational social movements coming out of Latin America.

With fist aloft and crying out “Viva Sandino” Walter, grandson of Nicaraguan revolutionary leader Augusto Sandino, described all of delegates as descendants of those Latin American leaders who like his grandfather fought and inspired others. Power is changing from the hands of a small rich elite to new leaders who are supported by trade unions, women, indigenous people and all those who believe in the fact that “another world is possible”. It was a fitting and passionate note on which to end a truly inspirational, informative and well organised conference.

Celebrations continued into the night at Bolivar Hall, where the Fiesta Latina enabled conference participants to enjoy the continents vibrant and varied culture with live music and dancing. Rum cocktails and Latin American food were served, and performances from Cuban, Venezuelan and Colombian performers were weaved together with the latest Latin dance tracks from Movimientos DJs.

The evening opened with an acoustic set of Latin American folk songs from Silvia Fox followed by a virtuoso performance form Cuban jazz and classical violinist Omar Puente and guest guitarist, including a rousing finale and encore with audience participation to Che Comandante and Guantanamera. Headlining the night were five piece Cumbé, whose Afro-Colombian sounds got the audience up on their feet, completing 12 hours of discussion, seminars, speakers, films, food, dance, and live music which brought Latin America and the Caribbean to snowbound central London.

Thanks to organisers Cuba Solidarity Campaign, Venezuela Solidarity Campaign and SERTUC, and all sponsors.

Beating the Blockade Seminar Report, Latin America 2010

In a lively discussion on the US blockade of Cuba, Steve Ludlam, lecturer at the University of Sheffield, denounced the embargo as the “relentless strangulation of Cuba”. As Ludlam contended, the blockade of Cuba constitutes just one facet of a dirty war against the island which includes US-sponsored terrorist groups attacking the Cuban government and the persecution and imprisonment of those defending Cuba’s right to self-determination, such as the Miami 5.

Bob Oram, Unison NEC, affirmed that the US blockade has been tightened and intensified since 1962 to “asphyxiate the economy and wear down the Cuban people”. The blockade and associated legislation has been expanded extraterritorially to adversely affect other countries trading with Cuba. As Oram postulated, US-initiated restrictions on banks, companies and shipping mean that it is practically impossible for most businesses to trade with Cuba, whilst those that do often face penalties from the US.

US pretext for the blockade asserts that Cuba fails to promote human rights but, as both the United Nations and Amnesty International have recently testified, the blockade disproportionately affects the most vulnerable people in Cuba. Luis Marron, Political Counsellor at the Cuban Embassy, described how a two year-old girl was denied medical treatment because the required medication was only available in the US. As Marron concluded, “the little girl wasn’t a communist and didn’t know who Castro was, she just happened to be born in Cuba”. Marron and Oram both rejected the US declaration that Cuba requires the blockade to justify internal economic conditions and referenced the Cuban Foreign Minister’s challenge to lift the embargo and normalise relations.

Both Ludlam and Luis Marron cited three obstacles to the removal of the blockade. Firstly, there is a lack of political will within the US to end the blockade as the political establishment seeks to demonstrate to Latin America and the developing world that “resistance is futile”. Secondly, the authority to remove the embargo is no longer held by the President and instead has to be passed by Congress. This further entrenches reactionary legislation and makes it harder to revoke. And finally, the influence of Cuban nationals in Miami prevents any repeal of the blockade. Florida is a key state in presidential elections and Barack Obama is the first President since 1959 to not have the electoral support of the ex-patriate Cuban lobby within Miami.

As a result, any policy change will not come from within the US political system. It requires solidarity across Latin America and real pressure from Europe. Ludlam heralded the work of the Cuba Solidarity Campaign working with the trade union movement within the UK to champion the Cuban cause whilst Luis Marron acclaimed the amazing support which Cuba has received – both politically and materially – and declared all solidarity as victory over a blockade which seeks to isolate Cuba. As Marron affirmed, “Cuba has survived 50 years without the US and will continue to exist and advance with or without the US”. Despite constant harassment and persecution, Cuba has met Millennium Goal targets in education and health - just think what would be possible without the blockade.

Latin America 2010 Speaker Videos

Cuban Ambassador, Esther Armenteros, Latin America 2010


Fidel Navarez, Latin America 2010


George Galloway, Latin America 2010


Ken Livingstone, Latin America 2010


Seumas Milne, Latin America 2010

Another world is possible, and Latin America is creating it now

The article below is an edited version of Seumas Milne's contribution at Latin America 2010. Seumas is a journalist at the Guardian.

Seumas Milne, Latin America 2010
Twenty years ago, when the Soviet Union collapsed and the Cold War came to a close, we were told that we were witnessing the end of history, the triumph of the free market, the emergence of a unipolar world and the death of socialism — in fact, the end of any systemic alternative to neo-liberal capitalism at all.

Two decades on, that all looks pretty foolish. Four things in particular have changed the picture fundamentally. The first has been the war on terror, the strategic defeat of the US in Iraq and Afghanistan and the failure of its attempt to impose its will by force on the Arab and Muslim world. The second has been the rise of China. The third has been the crash of 2008 and the discrediting of the neoliberal economic model. And the fourth, and most underestimated shift, has been the progressive tide that has swept Latin America.

All four elements are closely interconnected. But crucial to this whole process has been the fact that Latin America was the first region of the world to experience the full force of neoliberalism — during the Pinochet dictatorship in Chile in the 1970s — and also the first to revolt against it, in the wake of the financial crisis of 1998.

That led in turn to the wave of change which swept the old elites from politics and brought to power a succession of radical socialist and social-democratic governments, from Ecuador to Brazil, Paraguay to Argentina: challenging US domination and neoliberal orthodoxy, breaking down social and racial inequality, building independent regional integration and taking back resources from corporate control.

For decades, Latin America was mired in US-backed rightwing dictatorships, and socialist Cuba stood alone. The transformation of the past decade is symbolised for me by the fate of Che Guevara’s killer, Sergeant Mario Teran. On 9th October 1967, Guevara faced a shaking Teran in La Higuera, Bolivia, and told him: “Shoot coward, you’re only killing a man”. The moment is the climax of Stephen Soderbergh’s film Che, and in real life it marked the defeat of the attempt to spread the Cuban revolution in Latin America.

But forty years later, the blind, reviled Teran had his sight restored by Cuban doctors, paid for by revolutionary Venezuela in the radicalised Bolivia of Evo Morales. That’s part of a programme that has seen 1.5 million free eye operations carried out in 33 countries in Latin America, the Caribbean and Africa, courtesy of the Cuban and Bolivarian revolutions.

It’s an emblem of the humanity of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara’s legacy – but also of the passing of the Cuban torch to a new generation of Latin American revolutionaries and progressives.

And the radical change they are making in Latin America is multi-dimensional. First of all it has a social and class dimension: at the cutting edge, Venezuela has halved poverty, massively expanded free health and education and boosted public ownership and control – echoed across the continent.

Second, it has a democratic core, reflected in the constitutional transformation and experiments in direct democracy in a string of Latin American countries. Then there is the ethnic dimension, seen in the political awakening of the indigenous population of the entire region and symbolised by the previously unthinkable election of Morales, an Aymara Indian, as president of Bolivia.

On top of that there is the regional dimension, made clear by the powerful new drive towards autonomous Latin American economic integration. And finally, there is the vital international dimension, played out in the ejection of US military bases, such as the Manta airbase in Ecuador, and the assertion of an independent foreign policy by almost every state across the region, notably including Brazil.

But most important of all, there has been the global impact: Latin America has shown that there can be systemic alternatives, that a 21st century socialism can be constructed, that people make their own history — and another world is not only possible, but is being created right now.

Of course none of these advances is settled or irreversible. Some are more radical than others. There are, naturally, many internal weaknesses and challenges in all the countries where progressive change is taking place. And the process is threatened from both within and without.

In particular the US, which has long dominated Latin America, was distracted fighting its war on terror in the Arab and Muslim world while this movement of transformation was gaining strength. But now, even under the Obama administration, the US foreign policy establishment has made clear that it is committed to rollback, building new bases in Colombia, potentially to intervene again across the region.

Despite Obama’s warning that it risked creating a “terrible precedent”, the 2009 coup in Honduras was allowed to stand with US support – or, as Hillary Clinton put, “managed to a successful conclusion”. Honduras was a signal that the democratic and radical tide could be turned back, and was followed by the failed coup against Rafael Correa in Ecuador.

That’s one reason why the Latin American left needs international solidarity. Such support should include pressure on the British government and the European Union to oppose any anti-democratic backlash or foreign intervention against a movement for social justice that any decent person should be able to back, along with the demand that our media report fairly what’s actually going on in the region.

But we also need to learn from what is taking place in Latin America. Of course these are diverse societies which face some very different problems from our own. But the common sense about the bankruptcy of neoliberal capitalism that was first recognised and acted on in Latin America has now gone global.

There are direct lessons now for countries such as Ireland and Greece from Argentina’s debt default in the early years of the last decade — and its subsequent economic expansion. But the wider question for us is whether some of the progressive and socialist change that has delivered for the people of Latin America in the last decade can be generated here, in this part of the world as well.

Cuba – a better world is possible

"Cuba demonstrates how much nations can do with the resources they have if they focus on the right priorities - health, education, and literacy." Kofi Annan, former UN Secretary General
May Day Parade, Havana

The current changes sweeping across Latin America have their roots in the same principles of social justice that transformed Cuban society 50 years ago.

On 1 January 1959 the Cuban Revolution freed the country from the brutal US-backed Batista dictatorship. Immediately, the government committed itself to a sweeping programme of health and education reforms, and to returning to the people the country’s natural resources and land from the hands of a local elite, foreign governments and multinationals.

Just as progressive Latin American governments are facing a backlash from the right today, Cuba has withstood extreme propaganda and attacks from the most powerful state on earth for 50 years. For 48 of these it has suffered under sustained economic warfare in the form of an inhumane and illegal US blockade – the longest in history.

Even the US itself admits the severity of its actions. According to the United States Government Accountability Office in 2009: “The embargo on Cuba is the most comprehensive set of US sanctions on any country, including the other countries designated by the US government to be state sponsors of terrorism”.

In 2007, the Personal Representative of the High Commissioner for Human Rights stated:
The restrictions imposed by the embargo help to deprive Cuba of vital access to medicines, new scientific and medical technology, food, chemical water treatment and electricity.
Numerous reports, most notably the 300-page, 1997 report by the American Association for World Health (AAWH) identify that the blockade contributes to the malnutrition of women and children, poor water quality, and lack of access to medicines and medical supplies. The AAWH declared that “a humanitarian catastrophe has been averted only because the Cuban government has maintained a high level of budgetary support for a health care system designed to deliver primary and preventive health care to all of its citizens.”

The United Nations and human rights groups including Amnesty International have condemned the blockade for violating international law, and on moral, political and economic grounds. Yet, President Obama has taken no steps to dismantle it.

US academic Noam Chomsky argues that the blockade remains in place for the same reasons it was imposed by President Kennedy in 1962:
The actual reasons for the terror and economic warfare were explained clearly at the very outset: the goal was to cause “rising discomfort among hungry Cubans” so that they would overthrow the regime (Kennedy); to “bring about hunger, desperation, and overthrow of the government” (Eisenhower’s State Department). The threat of Cuba, as Kennedy’s Latin American advisor Arthur Schlesinger advised the incoming president, is that successful independent development there might stimulate others who suffer from similar problems to follow the same course, so that the system of US domination might unravel.
Almost half a century after Kennedy, US aggression towards Cuba continues. Aside from the everyday deprivations caused by the blockade, undercover operations and open backing for invasion and terrorist attacks have been replaced by USAID funding that increasingly focus on the internet to promote so-called democracy programmes. In this manner, the US government continues to fund groups and individuals in and outside Cuba intent in bringing down the government and imposing neo-liberal models and privatisation on the island.

Despite this, Cuba maintains a healthy, educated and vibrant society. Cuba is not perfect. Like anywhere it faces problems and struggles, but its achievements and spirit of international solidarity reach across the globe. As Nelson Mandela said: “The Cuban revolution has been a source of inspiration to all freedom-loving people.”

Cuban internationalism from playing a pivotal role in the liberation of Angola and downfall of Apartheid in South Africa, to the 938 medical staff currently volunteering in Haiti, and the tens of thousands of students from developing countries receiving free Cuban medical scholarships are an inspiration to millions of people, especially in the developing world.

Through free health and education programmes for the poorest and most vulnerable on the planet Cuba offers hope that a better world is possible. And just as Schlesinger feared, US domination in the region is unravelling. As Noam Chomsky said:
Cuba has become a symbol of courageous resistance to attack. It has been invaded, subjected to more terror than maybe the rest of the world combined--certainly any other country that I can think of--and it's under an economic stranglehold that has been ruled completely illegal by every relevant international body, It has been at the receiving end of terrorism, repression and denunciation, but it survives.
The Cuba Solidarity Campaign works in the UK to campaign against the illegal blockade of Cuba and for Cuba’s right to self-determination. Please join CSC today!

Natasha Hickman, Communications Manager at the Cuba Solidarity Campaign. Please email for more information.

Venezuela’s social progress under threat from US intervention

For decades most Venezuelans lived in poverty, in barrios (shanty towns) with unreliable electricity, unsafe water and desperately inadequate public services. In recent years, ordinary people’s lives have been transformed.  This inspiring process has been made possible by a sustained rise in social investment, with the government redistributing the country’s oil wealth from a small and privileged elite to the majority of people.
 
Inspiring social changes include:
  • More than 2.7 million Venezuelans have been lifted out of poverty since 1998, with extreme poverty halved, and poverty rates continuing to fall.
  • Over 17 million people now have access to free healthcare for the first time, with a national heath service being built for the first time.
  • Over 1.6 million adults have benefited from literacy campaigns with illiteracy now abolished according to UNESCO standards.
  • More than 6 million more people now have clean drinking water, with access increasing from 80% in 1998 to over 92% today.
  • 98 per cent of Venezuelans now eat three times per day thanks to government provision of subsidised food and free school meals.
  • New rights for working people - Venezuela’s minimum wage is now the highest in Latin America, unemployment has been significantly reduced and outsourcing made illegal.
  • The creation of a Women’s Development Bank and new Ministry for Women, giving opportunities to millions of previously excluded women.
  • Historic racism is being tackled with new constitutional rights for indigenous people and recognition of the rights of other black and minority ethnic communities.
  • The expansion of the Simon Bolivar Youth Orchestra programme, which provides free musical education to thousands of children from poor backgrounds.
Due to these progressive social policies, amazingly, Venezuela has met the UN Millennium Development Goals six years ahead of schedule, whilst many countries are decades behind.
 
Additionally, although against the backdrop of global recession the Venezuelan economy shrank by 3% in 2009, the government held firm on its commitment to maintain and increase spending in areas such as health, education and poverty reduction.
 
It is the case that much still needs to be done to overcome decades of neglect of the interests of the vast majority of Venezuelans, especially in the cities, but the achievements of the current government stand in stark contrast to previous governments, who oversaw rising poverty and failing living standards for 25 years.
 
Freeing Latin America from exploitation
 
As well as this social progress domestically Venezuela is seen as a beacon of hope across Southern America, encouraging progressive regional co-operation, as an alternative to decades of US domination and neo-liberalism.
 
Venezuela’s inspiring work internationally includes:
  • The joint programme with Cuba ‘Operation Miracle’ which is providing free eye operations to hundreds of thousands of poor people in Latin America, the Caribbean and now Africa.
  • Supplying oil at preferential prices to 13 Latin American and Caribbean countries to help their economies.
  • The ALBA (‘Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas’) agreement with other Latin American and Caribbean nations - an alternative to the US-promoted Free Trade Area of the Americas.
  • Creating a Latin American television station, Telesur, to challenge US cultural domination and the distortion of the truth by the media.
Chávez’s Democratic Record
 
These changes in Venezuela have received enormous democratic approval, with Chávez and his supporters have won fourteen out of fifteen national elections and referenda since 1998.
 
In this time, democratic participation in Venezuela has increased, with millions of previously excluded people being enfranchised. Grassroots democracy has also been expanded with the formation and funding of thousands of ‘Community Councils’ across the country.
 
Contrary to distortions in the media and from opponents of the government, the annual survey of Latin American views, by the respected Latinobarametro, shows that Venezuelans have a strong approval for their democracy.
 
Venezuela next goes to the polls for National Assembly elections in September 2010. In these elections, the right-wing opposition will inevitably increase its number of seats, as it boycotted the previous parliamentary elections – in a blatant attempt to undermine their legitimacy – when it was clear they would lose.
 
Threats to social progress and sovereignty — solidarity needed!
 
Inevitably, the progressive changes of recent years have not been welcomed by the former ruling elite in Venezuela and their allies internationally who remain committed to neo-liberalism. In particular, many within the United States want to regain control of Venezuelan oil resources, by putting the old Venezuelan elite back into power, and prevent a further strengthening of national sovereignty and economic independence across Latin America.
 
In recent years, this has seen various attempts to undermine Venezuela’s elected government. The US appeared to be behind a failed military coup in 2002. The following this, organised attempts to sabotage fist the oil industry — the mainstay of the economy — strongly indicated US involvement.
 
This threat has not gone away under the Obama administration. The US National Director of Intelligence, Admiral Dennis Blair, in his annual report for 2010 classifies Venezuela as an “anti-US Leader” in the world.
This followed the announcement of more US bases in neighbouring Colombia meaning that Venezuela is surrounded by 13 US military bases in addition to the aircraft carriers and ships of the US Fourth Fleet, which was reactivated in 2008 in order to patrol the Atlantic Coast of South America.
 
The coup against the progressive government in Honduras, and the discovery of similar plots in Ecuador and Paraguay, also show the continuing threat of social progress in Venezuela being overturned.
 
Within Venezuela, the right wing opposition also continues to hold democracy and the rule of law in contempt, seeking to destabilise the government.
 
Media Distortion and Misrepresentation
 
Alongside these developments, opponents of Venezuela’s elected government have also orchestrated an international media campaign of distortion and misrepresentation aimed at isolating support for the Chávez-led Government.
 
Within Venezuela, there is great concern that such international demonization of Chávez could be used as a pretext for further interventions and ‘regime change.’
 
That is why the Venezuela Solidarity Campaign works to explain the truth about Venezuela and support the country’s right to self-determination – you can help by joining VSC today.
 
Matt Willgress, Coordinator of the Venezuela Solidarity Campaign

"United, organised and trained we are invincible!"

Helen Yuill, Nicaragua Solidarity Campaign, interviews Orlando José Mercado Mendoza who is appearing at Latin America 2010 about how informal sector workers are organising and the new spaces created for them under the recently elected FSLN government.
Helen and Orlando

Orlando Mercado is Secretary of the Confederación de Trabajadores por Cuenta Propia (CTCP) in Nicaragua. From its formation in 2002 the membership has grown to 40,000 and the Confederation now coordinates a network of informal sector unions throughout Central America. As Orlando points out, this is a great achievement but, with an estimated one million workers engaged in informal sector activity in the country, there is much to be done.

Informal sector work comprises many different activities. Orlando Mercado is General Secretary of the Currency Exchangers Federation, one of seven federations which unite to form the CTCP. Workers could be street traders, traffic lights vendors, craftspeople, tricyle taxi drivers, agricultural workers, rubbish pickers or tortilla producers. As well as running training workshops in union organising and labour rights, the CTCP also run workshops aimed at raising workers’ self esteem and provide training in business administration and literacy. The union is also fighting for greater recognition of the valuable contribution they make to the economy.

Orlando emphasised that self employed work is growing in Nicaragua and worldwide. Although over 65 per cent of Nicaragua’s workforce are working within the informal sector, between 1990 and 2006, under successive neoliberal governments they were largely ignored. When the current FSLN government was elected in 2007, they were finally given formal recognition. As most workers in the sector are not covered by social security the union has set up mutual health funds allowing access to cheaper medication and health promotion. International support has been important to this work and a number of external organisations, including UNISON from the UK, have supported their activities.

Through the union, members are enabled to act collectively to oppose evictions. In a protest in early 2009 unionised workers from the different unions within the CTCP mobilised in solidarity with the currency changers to protest their eviction by a local supermarket, blocking entrances and bringing sales to a standstill. The owners were forced to negotiate and the union achieved an agreement that they could stay, something they have had to fight for since 1990.

As Orlando points out, ‘In the UK you are learning about informal sector workers and how we are organising. In other parts of the world people do this kind of work too but it’s hidden. This is a country that is starting to know about our work and what we do for the economy in our country.  The CTCP works with the hungry, dispossessed and forgotten. We are not afraid to mobilise because it is the only way to defend our right to work. Our work can only happen through solidarity between our members. This is why the CTCP has the slogan: UNIDOS, ORGANIZADOS Y CAPACITADOS SEREMOS INVENCIBLES! United, organised and trained we are invincible!’